Tag Archives: David Letterman

My Favorite Pods

You may be asking, “What’s a pod?” Is it a vessel holding 2 peas? A container where an alien resides like in the movies Invasion Of The Body Snatchers and Cocoon? Good guesses, but no. A pod is just a lazy man’s way of saying podcast. A podcast is a program made available in digital format for download over the internet. (Thank you Google.) The word podcast is a combination of “iPod” and “broadcast” and believe it or not has been in existence since 2004, with its concept established in 2000. (Thank you Wikipedia.) I view my favorite pods via YouTube on my computer screen, so I can have the visual contents in addition to the audio.

I discovered pods a couple years back when I was browsing the web looking for a little extra help in making my excellent fantasy football team even better. Low and behold, I quickly came across The Fantasy Footballers podcast, and it has been a favorite ever since. Andy Holloway, Mike Wright, and Jason Moore co-host the informative and entertaining show. The trio are a hoot and claim to be besties – which seems obvious by the way they’re willing to publicly make fun of one another on a regular basis. The Fantasy Footballers pod airs all year long with increased episodes (and intensity) ramping up the closer it gets to the actual NFL season.

By religiously watching The Fantasy Footballers pod, I eventually was led to a much different type of podcast that I certainly had not been looking for. Come to find out, the same three amigos have another show called the Spitballers Comedy Podcast, and instantly it became another favorite pod of mine. You get an idea, yet not to the full extent, of what you’re getting yourself into when you click on any one of their hundreds of episodes and you hear the announcer say, “What happens when three buffoons give life advice, explore unrealistic situations, and give random topics more thought than they probably deserve? It’s the Spitballers podcast with Andy, Mike, and Jason.”

The 3 peas in a pod (pun intended) are all in their early forties, married, and have three kids apiece. Besides their entrepreneurial spirit, and their love for fantasy football, pickleball, and bidets (yes, bidets) Andy, Mike, and Jason really aren’t that much alike once you get to know them. From their physical appearances (lanky, intimidating, plump) to their personalities (old soul, introvert, attention whore) the trio in actuality are as different as morning, noon, and night. (Relax – they know who and what they are – and I’m sure they’d all agree my descriptions of them are spot on.) The contrast in personalities is probably why the Spitballers pod works so well.

It’s both unbelievable and fascinating the length of discussion that can be had during a “Life Advice” segment on the Spitballers Comedy Podcast. An introverted listener recently asked the gentlemen what the best way might be to refuse full-on hugs at her husband’s large family gatherings. She has tried to tell her husband’s clan how she feels, but they’re big huggers and ignore her pleas. After much contemplation, the show’s “counselors” ultimately agreed there was really only one obvious piece of advice to give. And that advice was to show up in a wheelchair. Their thoughtful reasoning was that it’s very awkward to give a full-on hug to someone sitting down; however, they did warn her that she should probably brace herself for a lot of head pats, and maybe a few shoulder rubs from behind, in its place.

The deepest discussions on the Spitballers pod most often occur during the “Would You Rather?” segment of the hourish-long show. For example, “Would you rather always sound like you’re going through puberty, or always walk like you are in the marching band?” This is some serious stuff, folks. The Spitballers Comedy Podcast always concludes with a “Draft.” Taking turns, each fellow submits his four best answers (no duplicates allowed) to the question at hand. Their last draft was titled, “Gifts to give your enemies kids,” and some of the picks were a drumkit, glitter bomb, talking parrot, and pogo stick.

The rationale behind giving a child a pogo stick as a gift was that the kid would truly love the present, but the parents would not love the probable trip to the hospital and the ensuing medical bills. Maybe a disturbing thought process, but as Jason Moore reminds us, “A friend of my enemy is my enemy.” (I guess children are not excluded – they’re just collateral damage.) Other draft topics on the weekly pod have been “Things we miss from our childhood,” “Songs we are embarrassed to like,” “Best ways to cover up a fart,” and “Worst places to be when you need to poop.” Classy! The Spitballers show is mostly G-rated, but there is an ample amount of fart and poop talk on this comical podcast.

Shout out to one other pod in which I frequently dabble in and thoroughly enjoy. Conan O’Brien Needs A Friend admittedly is my guilty pleasure because the captivating show can become R-rated in an instant with a plethora of coarse language. These days foul language makes me cringe, but when Conan speaks it’s hard to look away. His brand of comedy is brilliantly outlandish. And he doesn’t need to perpetually go after certain politicians in order to get a cheap laugh – like so many others do. Conan’s two sidekicks, Sona Movsesian and Matt Gourley, are very amusing in their own right, and anytime Conan does anything with Jordan Schlansky – it’s GOLD! For my money, Conan O’Brien and David Letterman are by far the best late night television hosts in my lifetime.

You may be wondering where I find the time to watch so many podcasts. Well, most days the television isn’t even turned on until late afternoon, and some days literally not at all. Have you seen some of the stuff on the boob tube that’s supposedly entertainment? If it’s not an old movie (preferably in black and white) or Seinfeld reruns, I’m most-likely not interested. But I do have to fill my days with something, so enter the world of pods.


I Miss Dave

Once again, I’m guilty of overestimating the common sense of the citizens of this great country. I’m a bit perplexed by the public’s response to President Donald Trump’s firing of the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), James Comey. I know by now I shouldn’t be surprised about anything regarding politics, or the American people, but I really want to be an optimist. If I remember correctly (and I do) not so long ago the majority of Democrats were calling for Comey’s head because he supposedly had cost Hillary Clinton the presidency. Trump and the Republicans weren’t too thrilled with Comey either after he eventually cleared Clinton of any criminal wrongdoing just two days prior to the 2016 presidential election. Now, apparently everyone is enamored with James Comey. Oh my, how things quickly change when trying to rewrite history.

This whole sordid mess began in July of 2015, when the FBI opened a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email use during her tenure as our nation’s Secretary of State. The matter had seemingly been put to rest, but Director Comey resurrected the mild scandal on October 28th, 2016, by way of a letter to Congress. He informed them that the FBI was reviewing additional emails for possible violations committed by Clinton. Many Hillary supporters blamed Comey’s ill-timed announcement for Clinton’s loss to Trump in last year’s election. However, I’d argue that Comey’s final letter to Congress on November 6th, 2016, actually did more damage to the Trump campaign than his previous letter did to the Clinton camp. Declaring Clinton’s innocence of any criminal wrongdoing (less than 48 hours before ballots were to be cast) surely worked in Hillary’s favor in regards to garnering any of the remaining undecided voters.

Regardless, if there was one thing both sides of the political arena could agree on, a short six months ago, it was their bipartisan dislike of James Comey. His unconventional actions were controversial, confusing, reckless, and quite possibly grounds for dismissal. Yet, after President Trump’s recent firing of the FBI Director, many (from both sides of the aisle) who once despised Comey are now suddenly very supportive of him and irate at Trump for letting him go. What’s there to say? Trump haters are gonna hate.

I presume that’s also the reason for all the hubbub out there concerning President Trump and Russia. Yes, I know there’s those pesky reports about the Trump administration’s possible ties to Russia. Yes, the timing of James Comey’s dismissal could be construed as a tad suspect: he indeed was in the process of ramping up his investigation into Trump’s possible past association with Russia. Comey’s recent firing shouldn’t be too worrisome for Trump haters since Arizona Senator, John McCain, immediately called for another investigation into the Russia situation. (I wonder who’s paying for all of these investigations.)

Look, I couldn’t care less if the President, or those in his administration, had previous business dealings with Russia. Haven’t the majority of those vociferously opposed to Trump been preaching to the public that globalism is a great thing? What probably frustrates me the most about this country is that we are so quick to come to a conclusion before receiving all of the information. In essence, we come to the conclusions WE WANT…based on our emotions rather than the truth. If it is ever proven that President Trump is (or has been) in cahoots with Russia then I will be the first in line demanding his resignation and lobbying for treason charges to be brought against him. Believe me.

There is one thing we know for certain at this time concerning Trump’s possible ties to Russia. Stephen Colbert, host of The Late Show, has found President Trump guilty. There’s no mistaking where David Letterman’s predecessor stands on this issue. This is not fake news. In fact, last week Colbert went on an extended tirade about the President, and then he proudly confirmed what he had previously said the very next evening. Some on the right have demanded an apology from the liberal host, but Colbert continues to stand by what he said. After calling Trump a “pricktator,” among other things, Stephen Colbert then told President Trump, “The only thing your mouth is good for is being Vladimir Putin’s c**k holster.” Letterman’s replacement sure has turned The Late Show from what was once a respectable, highly entertaining talk show into a biased, anger filled political program.

Many on the left think Colbert’s joke was hilarious, and they are pointing to the First Amendment in defense of his right to say what he said. I can’t argue with the latter. However, I would like to ask those who’ve sided with Colbert, and think the joke is funny, this one simple question. What if during President Obama’s presidency someone had said Obama was a “c**k holster” for Bashar al-Assad? Funny? Former President Obama did indeed draw that infamous red line in which Assad fearlessly crossed without any repercussions whatsoever. So, would that joke about Obama have been hilarious? Of course not. Just because we are allowed to publicly say something so crude and tasteless certainly does not mean that we should especially when it comes to disrespecting those elected to the Oval Office. The older I get, the less impressed I am with our country’s freedom of speech. Boy, I sure could use a dose of Letterman right about now.